Skip to content
ratio

Tyre comparison

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

The Blizzak LM005 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Blizzak LM005 for dry grip and wet grip.

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM005

Excellent wet and snow braking.

Winter · Premium

Nokian

Hakkapeliitta R5

Nordic studless benchmark for ice.

Winter · Premium

Fit score by driver

The same 0–100 score the calculator ranks tyres by, weighted for each kind of driver. How we score

DriverBlizzak LM005Hakkapeliitta R5
Snow and ice76 (higher)56
Cold, wet winters74 (higher)49
Daily, mild climate73 (higher)44

Trait by trait

Out of 10, against other winter tyres.

Blizzak LM005Hakkapeliitta R5
Dry grip74
Wet grip94
Tread life65
Quiet & comfort65
Efficiency65
Snow & ice910

Blizzak LM005

Where the scores come from

Independent tests

Tested by
Tyre Reviews

TyreReviews 18 tests: wet brake avg 38.44 m vs TS870P 40.58 m; snow brake 23.96 m.

Data last reviewed: October 2026

Hakkapeliitta R5

Where the scores come from

Estimated: no independent test of this tyre found

Nordic studless positioning (ice/snow); no test figures found; dry/wet set low by design.

Data last reviewed: October 2026

Questions

Which is better, the Blizzak LM005 or the Hakkapeliitta R5?

The Blizzak LM005 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Blizzak LM005 for dry grip and wet grip.

Where do these ratings come from?

From independent tyre tests where they exist (ADAC, Auto Bild, Tyre Reviews, evo, Tire Rack and others), rated 1 to 10 against other tyres in the same category, last reviewed October 2026. Neither tyre maker nor any retailer can change them.