Skip to content
ratio

Tyre comparison

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 II vs Michelin Energy XM2+

The Energy XM2+ scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Energy XM2+ for tread life and efficiency. The Dueler H/T 684 II usually costs less.

Bridgestone

Dueler H/T 684 II

Durable highway-terrain tyre for utes.

Touring & eco · Mid-range

Michelin

Energy XM2+

Long-life benchmark for small cars; strong wet braking.

Touring & eco · Premium

Fit score by driver

The same 0–100 score the calculator ranks tyres by, weighted for each kind of driver. How we score

DriverDueler H/T 684 IIEnergy XM2+
Daily driving, wet winters5566 (higher)
Spirited roads, warm climate5463 (higher)
Longest life and lowest cost5869 (higher)

Trait by trait

Out of 10, against other touring tyres.

Dueler H/T 684 IIEnergy XM2+
Dry grip55
Wet grip56
Tread life79
Quiet & comfort66
Efficiency58

Dueler H/T 684 II

Where the scores come from

Estimated: no independent test of this tyre found

Tested by
Tyre Reviews

TyreReviews generic rating ~7.3; no independent test of 684 II found.

Data last reviewed: October 2026

Energy XM2+

Where the scores come from

Estimated: no independent test of this tyre found

Older Energy XM2 gen; maker positioning (long life, low drag); no current test found.

Data last reviewed: October 2026

Questions

Which is better, the Dueler H/T 684 II or the Energy XM2+?

The Energy XM2+ scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Energy XM2+ for tread life and efficiency. The Dueler H/T 684 II usually costs less.

Where do these ratings come from?

From independent tyre tests where they exist (ADAC, Auto Bild, Tyre Reviews, evo, Tire Rack and others), rated 1 to 10 against other tyres in the same category, last reviewed October 2026. Neither tyre maker nor any retailer can change them.