Tyre comparison
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52
The Turanza 6 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Turanza 6 for dry grip, tread life, quiet & comfort and efficiency. The Ecsta HS52 usually costs less.
Fit score by driver
The same 0–100 score the calculator ranks tyres by, weighted for each kind of driver. How we score
| Driver | Turanza 6 | Ecsta HS52 |
|---|---|---|
| Daily driving, wet winters | 67 (higher) | 55 |
| Spirited roads, warm climate | 68 (higher) | 53 |
| Longest life and lowest cost | 69 (higher) | 53 |
Trait by trait
Out of 10, against other grand touring tyres.
Turanza 6
Where the scores come from
Independent tests
- Tested by
- Auto Bild
- Year
- 2024
- Test size
- 205/55R16
Auto Bild 2024 205/55R16: 94.0%, wet 43.6 m, 34,400 km.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Ecsta HS52
Where the scores come from
Independent tests
- Tested by
- Tyre Reviews
TyreReviews 8 tests vs Ventus Prime 4: HS52 won 5-3, ~0.4% quieter.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Questions
Which is better, the Turanza 6 or the Ecsta HS52?
The Turanza 6 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Turanza 6 for dry grip, tread life, quiet & comfort and efficiency. The Ecsta HS52 usually costs less.
Where do these ratings come from?
From independent tyre tests where they exist (ADAC, Auto Bild, Tyre Reviews, evo, Tire Rack and others), rated 1 to 10 against other tyres in the same category, last reviewed October 2026. Neither tyre maker nor any retailer can change them.