Tyre comparison
Falken Azenis FK520 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
The Azenis FK520 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. No trait separates them by more than a point, so buy on price and availability in your size.
Fit score by driver
The same 0–100 score the calculator ranks tyres by, weighted for each kind of driver. How we score
| Driver | Azenis FK520 | Ecsta PS71 |
|---|---|---|
| Daily driving, wet winters | 62 (higher) | 60 |
| Spirited roads, warm climate | 64 (higher) | 60 |
| Longest life and lowest cost | 59 (higher) | 57 |
Trait by trait
Out of 10, against other UHP summer tyres.
Azenis FK520
Where the scores come from
Independent tests
- Tested by
- ADAC
- Year
- 2026, 2025
ADAC 2025 wet brake 30.5 m; 2026 braking test 27.8 m wet (3rd of 52).
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Ecsta PS71
Where the scores come from
Independent tests
- Tested by
- ADAC
- Year
- 2025
ADAC 2025 wet braking 30.2 m (2nd of three UHP tyres compared); other metrics not read.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Questions
Which is better, the Azenis FK520 or the Ecsta PS71?
The Azenis FK520 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. No trait separates them by more than a point, so buy on price and availability in your size.
Where do these ratings come from?
From independent tyre tests where they exist (ADAC, Auto Bild, Tyre Reviews, evo, Tire Rack and others), rated 1 to 10 against other tyres in the same category, last reviewed October 2026. Neither tyre maker nor any retailer can change them.