Skip to content
ratio

Tyre comparison

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51

The EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the EfficientGrip Performance 2 for dry grip, wet grip, tread life and efficiency.

Goodyear

EfficientGrip Performance 2

Long-lasting, efficient and composed in the rain.

Grand touring · Mid-range

Yokohama

BluEarth-GT AE51

Balanced, quiet, good in the wet for the money.

Grand touring · Mid-range

Fit score by driver

The same 0–100 score the calculator ranks tyres by, weighted for each kind of driver. How we score

DriverEfficientGrip Performance 2BluEarth-GT AE51
Daily driving, wet winters70 (higher)42
Spirited roads, warm climate72 (higher)42
Longest life and lowest cost78 (higher)45

Trait by trait

Out of 10, against other grand touring tyres.

EfficientGrip Performance 2BluEarth-GT AE51
Dry grip74
Wet grip53
Tread life105
Quiet & comfort76
Efficiency96

EfficientGrip Performance 2

Where the scores come from

Independent tests

Tested by
Auto Bild
Year
2024
Test size
205/55R16

Auto Bild 2024 205/55R16: 94.9%, 45,250 km (best wear), wet 45.6 m.

Data last reviewed: October 2026

BluEarth-GT AE51

Where the scores come from

Independent tests

Tested by
Tyre Reviews

TyreReviews aggregate: wet braking 7.2% longer than premium; wet 84% vs Hankook 92%.

Data last reviewed: October 2026

Questions

Which is better, the EfficientGrip Performance 2 or the BluEarth-GT AE51?

The EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the EfficientGrip Performance 2 for dry grip, wet grip, tread life and efficiency.

Where do these ratings come from?

From independent tyre tests where they exist (ADAC, Auto Bild, Tyre Reviews, evo, Tire Rack and others), rated 1 to 10 against other tyres in the same category, last reviewed October 2026. Neither tyre maker nor any retailer can change them.