Skip to content
ratio

Tyre comparison

Kumho Ecsta PS91 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107

The Advan Sport V107 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Advan Sport V107 for wet grip. The Ecsta PS91 usually costs less.

Kumho

Ecsta PS91

Max-performance grip on a tighter budget.

Max performance summer · Value

Yokohama

Advan Sport V107

Premium-level grip, often cheaper.

Max performance summer · Mid-range

Fit score by driver

The same 0–100 score the calculator ranks tyres by, weighted for each kind of driver. How we score

DriverEcsta PS91Advan Sport V107
Daily driving, wet winters5062 (higher)
Spirited roads, warm climate5667 (higher)
Longest life and lowest cost5060 (higher)

Trait by trait

Out of 10, against other max performance tyres.

Ecsta PS91Advan Sport V107
Dry grip78
Wet grip57
Tread life45
Quiet & comfort45
Efficiency43

Ecsta PS91

Where the scores come from

Estimated: no independent test of this tyre found

Older gen; no current test read; kept near average.

Data last reviewed: October 2026

Advan Sport V107

Where the scores come from

Independent tests

Tested by
evo
Year
2025

EVO 2025: 2nd dry braking 32 m, 3rd curved aquaplaning; high rolling resistance.

Data last reviewed: October 2026

Questions

Which is better, the Ecsta PS91 or the Advan Sport V107?

The Advan Sport V107 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Advan Sport V107 for wet grip. The Ecsta PS91 usually costs less.

Where do these ratings come from?

From independent tyre tests where they exist (ADAC, Auto Bild, Tyre Reviews, evo, Tire Rack and others), rated 1 to 10 against other tyres in the same category, last reviewed October 2026. Neither tyre maker nor any retailer can change them.