Tyre comparison
Bridgestone Alenza 001 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52
The Alenza 001 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. No trait separates them by more than a point, so buy on price and availability in your size. The Ecsta HS52 usually costs less.
Fit score by driver
The same 0–100 score the calculator ranks tyres by, weighted for each kind of driver. How we score
| Driver | Alenza 001 | Ecsta HS52 |
|---|---|---|
| Daily driving, wet winters | 60 (higher) | 55 |
| Spirited roads, warm climate | 60 (higher) | 53 |
| Longest life and lowest cost | 60 (higher) | 53 |
Trait by trait
Out of 10, against other grand touring tyres.
Alenza 001
Where the scores come from
Estimated: no independent test of this tyre found
No recent test found; OE premium SUV tyre, older design; kept near average.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Ecsta HS52
Where the scores come from
Independent tests
- Tested by
- Tyre Reviews
TyreReviews 8 tests vs Ventus Prime 4: HS52 won 5-3, ~0.4% quieter.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Questions
Which is better, the Alenza 001 or the Ecsta HS52?
The Alenza 001 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. No trait separates them by more than a point, so buy on price and availability in your size. The Ecsta HS52 usually costs less.
Where do these ratings come from?
From independent tyre tests where they exist (ADAC, Auto Bild, Tyre Reviews, evo, Tire Rack and others), rated 1 to 10 against other tyres in the same category, last reviewed October 2026. Neither tyre maker nor any retailer can change them.