Tyre comparison
Bridgestone Alenza 001 vs Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51
The Alenza 001 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Alenza 001 for dry grip and wet grip. The BluEarth-GT AE51 usually costs less.
Fit score by driver
The same 0–100 score the calculator ranks tyres by, weighted for each kind of driver. How we score
| Driver | Alenza 001 | BluEarth-GT AE51 |
|---|---|---|
| Daily driving, wet winters | 60 (higher) | 42 |
| Spirited roads, warm climate | 60 (higher) | 42 |
| Longest life and lowest cost | 60 (higher) | 45 |
Trait by trait
Out of 10, against other grand touring tyres.
Alenza 001
Where the scores come from
Estimated: no independent test of this tyre found
No recent test found; OE premium SUV tyre, older design; kept near average.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
BluEarth-GT AE51
Where the scores come from
Independent tests
- Tested by
- Tyre Reviews
TyreReviews aggregate: wet braking 7.2% longer than premium; wet 84% vs Hankook 92%.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Questions
Which is better, the Alenza 001 or the BluEarth-GT AE51?
The Alenza 001 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Alenza 001 for dry grip and wet grip. The BluEarth-GT AE51 usually costs less.
Where do these ratings come from?
From independent tyre tests where they exist (ADAC, Auto Bild, Tyre Reviews, evo, Tire Rack and others), rated 1 to 10 against other tyres in the same category, last reviewed October 2026. Neither tyre maker nor any retailer can change them.