Tyre comparison
Continental ExtremeContact Force vs Kumho Ecsta V730
The ExtremeContact Force scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. No trait separates them by more than a point, so buy on price and availability in your size. The Ecsta V730 usually costs less.
Continental
ExtremeContact Force
Consistent over long sessions; lasts well for a 200TW.
Extreme performance (200TW) · Mid-range
Fit score by driver
The same 0–100 score the calculator ranks tyres by, weighted for each kind of driver. How we score
| Driver | ExtremeContact Force | Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| Mostly track | 77 (higher) | 67 |
| Road + track days | 72 (higher) | 62 |
| Spirited roads | 72 (higher) | 62 |
Trait by trait
Out of 10, against other extreme 200TW tyres.
ExtremeContact Force
Where the scores come from
Estimated: no independent test of this tyre found
- Tested by
- Tire Rack
Tire Rack/GRM 200TW coverage; no lap numbers read.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Ecsta V730
Where the scores come from
Independent tests
- Tested by
- Tire Rack
- Year
- 2024
Tire Rack 2024: 'a little less grip than the others'.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Questions
Which is better, the ExtremeContact Force or the Ecsta V730?
The ExtremeContact Force scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. No trait separates them by more than a point, so buy on price and availability in your size. The Ecsta V730 usually costs less.
Where do these ratings come from?
From independent tyre tests where they exist (ADAC, Auto Bild, Tyre Reviews, evo, Tire Rack and others), rated 1 to 10 against other tyres in the same category, last reviewed October 2026. Neither tyre maker nor any retailer can change them.