Tyre comparison
Kumho Ecsta V730 vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD09
The Advan Neova AD09 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Ecsta V730 for tread life. Choose the Advan Neova AD09 for dry grip. The Ecsta V730 usually costs less.
Yokohama
Advan Neova AD09
Very quick and more forgiving than most 200TW tyres.
Extreme performance (200TW) · Premium
Fit score by driver
The same 0–100 score the calculator ranks tyres by, weighted for each kind of driver. How we score
| Driver | Ecsta V730 | Advan Neova AD09 |
|---|---|---|
| Mostly track | 67 | 81 (higher) |
| Road + track days | 62 | 70 (higher) |
| Spirited roads | 62 | 69 (higher) |
Trait by trait
Out of 10, against other extreme 200TW tyres.
Ecsta V730
Where the scores come from
Independent tests
- Tested by
- Tire Rack
- Year
- 2024
Tire Rack 2024: 'a little less grip than the others'.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Advan Neova AD09
Where the scores come from
Independent tests
- Tested by
- Tire Rack
- Year
- 2024
Tire Rack 2024 Extreme test 5 (included); detail not read; positioned forgiving.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Questions
Which is better, the Ecsta V730 or the Advan Neova AD09?
The Advan Neova AD09 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Ecsta V730 for tread life. Choose the Advan Neova AD09 for dry grip. The Ecsta V730 usually costs less.
Where do these ratings come from?
From independent tyre tests where they exist (ADAC, Auto Bild, Tyre Reviews, evo, Tire Rack and others), rated 1 to 10 against other tyres in the same category, last reviewed October 2026. Neither tyre maker nor any retailer can change them.