Tyre comparison
Falken Ziex ZE310 Ecorun vs Michelin Energy XM2+
The Energy XM2+ scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Energy XM2+ for tread life and efficiency. The Ziex ZE310 Ecorun usually costs less.
Fit score by driver
The same 0–100 score the calculator ranks tyres by, weighted for each kind of driver. How we score
| Driver | Ziex ZE310 Ecorun | Energy XM2+ |
|---|---|---|
| Daily driving, wet winters | 53 | 66 (higher) |
| Spirited roads, warm climate | 53 | 63 (higher) |
| Longest life and lowest cost | 54 | 69 (higher) |
Trait by trait
Out of 10, against other touring tyres.
Ziex ZE310 Ecorun
Where the scores come from
Estimated: no independent test of this tyre found
- Tested by
- Auto Bild
- Year
- 2018
- Test size
- 195/65R15
Auto Bild 2018 195/65R15: 6th of 47; older test.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Energy XM2+
Where the scores come from
Estimated: no independent test of this tyre found
Older Energy XM2 gen; maker positioning (long life, low drag); no current test found.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Questions
Which is better, the Ziex ZE310 Ecorun or the Energy XM2+?
The Energy XM2+ scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Energy XM2+ for tread life and efficiency. The Ziex ZE310 Ecorun usually costs less.
Where do these ratings come from?
From independent tyre tests where they exist (ADAC, Auto Bild, Tyre Reviews, evo, Tire Rack and others), rated 1 to 10 against other tyres in the same category, last reviewed October 2026. Neither tyre maker nor any retailer can change them.