Tyre comparison
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 vs Falken Ziex ZE310 Ecorun
The Ecopia EP300 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Ecopia EP300 for efficiency. The Ziex ZE310 Ecorun usually costs less.
Fit score by driver
The same 0–100 score the calculator ranks tyres by, weighted for each kind of driver. How we score
| Driver | Ecopia EP300 | Ziex ZE310 Ecorun |
|---|---|---|
| Daily driving, wet winters | 58 (higher) | 53 |
| Spirited roads, warm climate | 57 (higher) | 53 |
| Longest life and lowest cost | 61 (higher) | 54 |
Trait by trait
Out of 10, against other touring tyres.
Ecopia EP300
Where the scores come from
Estimated: no independent test of this tyre found
Maker positioning; Ecopia line tests (EP422) only; no EP300 test found.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Ziex ZE310 Ecorun
Where the scores come from
Estimated: no independent test of this tyre found
- Tested by
- Auto Bild
- Year
- 2018
- Test size
- 195/65R15
Auto Bild 2018 195/65R15: 6th of 47; older test.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Questions
Which is better, the Ecopia EP300 or the Ziex ZE310 Ecorun?
The Ecopia EP300 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Ecopia EP300 for efficiency. The Ziex ZE310 Ecorun usually costs less.
Where do these ratings come from?
From independent tyre tests where they exist (ADAC, Auto Bild, Tyre Reviews, evo, Tire Rack and others), rated 1 to 10 against other tyres in the same category, last reviewed October 2026. Neither tyre maker nor any retailer can change them.