Skip to content
ratio

Tyre comparison

Hankook iON evo vs Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51

The iON evo scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the iON evo for wet grip, quiet & comfort and efficiency.

Hankook

iON evo

EV-specific: quiet, efficient, high load capacity.

Grand touring · Mid-range

Yokohama

BluEarth-GT AE51

Balanced, quiet, good in the wet for the money.

Grand touring · Mid-range

Fit score by driver

The same 0–100 score the calculator ranks tyres by, weighted for each kind of driver. How we score

DriveriON evoBluEarth-GT AE51
Daily driving, wet winters63 (higher)42
Spirited roads, warm climate59 (higher)42
Longest life and lowest cost63 (higher)45
Electric car, daily70 (higher)44

Trait by trait

Out of 10, against other grand touring tyres.

iON evoBluEarth-GT AE51
Dry grip54
Wet grip63
Tread life65
Quiet & comfort86
Efficiency96

iON evo

Where the scores come from

Independent tests

Tested by
Tyre Reviews
Year
2025

TyreReviews 2025 EV test (Kona EV): overall winner; others very close.

Data last reviewed: October 2026

BluEarth-GT AE51

Where the scores come from

Independent tests

Tested by
Tyre Reviews

TyreReviews aggregate: wet braking 7.2% longer than premium; wet 84% vs Hankook 92%.

Data last reviewed: October 2026

Questions

Which is better, the iON evo or the BluEarth-GT AE51?

The iON evo scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the iON evo for wet grip, quiet & comfort and efficiency.

Where do these ratings come from?

From independent tyre tests where they exist (ADAC, Auto Bild, Tyre Reviews, evo, Tire Rack and others), rated 1 to 10 against other tyres in the same category, last reviewed October 2026. Neither tyre maker nor any retailer can change them.