Tyre comparison
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 vs Michelin Energy XM2+
The Energy XM2+ scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Energy XM2+ for wet grip. The Kinergy Eco 2 usually costs less.
Fit score by driver
The same 0–100 score the calculator ranks tyres by, weighted for each kind of driver. How we score
| Driver | Kinergy Eco 2 | Energy XM2+ |
|---|---|---|
| Daily driving, wet winters | 58 | 66 (higher) |
| Spirited roads, warm climate | 60 | 63 (higher) |
| Longest life and lowest cost | 64 | 69 (higher) |
Trait by trait
Out of 10, against other touring tyres.
Kinergy Eco 2
Where the scores come from
Estimated: no independent test of this tyre found
- Tested by
- ADAC
- Year
- 2019
- Test size
- 185/65R15
ADAC 2019 185/65R15: low fuel use, weak wet (older test).
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Energy XM2+
Where the scores come from
Estimated: no independent test of this tyre found
Older Energy XM2 gen; maker positioning (long life, low drag); no current test found.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Questions
Which is better, the Kinergy Eco 2 or the Energy XM2+?
The Energy XM2+ scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Energy XM2+ for wet grip. The Kinergy Eco 2 usually costs less.
Where do these ratings come from?
From independent tyre tests where they exist (ADAC, Auto Bild, Tyre Reviews, evo, Tire Rack and others), rated 1 to 10 against other tyres in the same category, last reviewed October 2026. Neither tyre maker nor any retailer can change them.