Tyre comparison
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
It depends on how you drive. No trait separates them by more than a point, so buy on price and availability in your size. The Kinergy Eco 2 usually costs less.
Fit score by driver
The same 0–100 score the calculator ranks tyres by, weighted for each kind of driver. How we score
| Driver | Ecopia EP300 | Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Daily driving, wet winters | 58 | 58 |
| Spirited roads, warm climate | 57 | 60 (higher) |
| Longest life and lowest cost | 61 | 64 (higher) |
Trait by trait
Out of 10, against other touring tyres.
Ecopia EP300
Where the scores come from
Estimated: no independent test of this tyre found
Maker positioning; Ecopia line tests (EP422) only; no EP300 test found.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Kinergy Eco 2
Where the scores come from
Estimated: no independent test of this tyre found
- Tested by
- ADAC
- Year
- 2019
- Test size
- 185/65R15
ADAC 2019 185/65R15: low fuel use, weak wet (older test).
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Questions
Which is better, the Ecopia EP300 or the Kinergy Eco 2?
It depends on how you drive. No trait separates them by more than a point, so buy on price and availability in your size. The Kinergy Eco 2 usually costs less.
Where do these ratings come from?
From independent tyre tests where they exist (ADAC, Auto Bild, Tyre Reviews, evo, Tire Rack and others), rated 1 to 10 against other tyres in the same category, last reviewed October 2026. Neither tyre maker nor any retailer can change them.