Tyre comparison
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52
The Ventus Prime 4 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. No trait separates them by more than a point, so buy on price and availability in your size. The Ecsta HS52 usually costs less.
Fit score by driver
The same 0–100 score the calculator ranks tyres by, weighted for each kind of driver. How we score
| Driver | Ventus Prime 4 | Ecsta HS52 |
|---|---|---|
| Daily driving, wet winters | 60 (higher) | 55 |
| Spirited roads, warm climate | 60 (higher) | 53 |
| Longest life and lowest cost | 58 (higher) | 53 |
Trait by trait
Out of 10, against other grand touring tyres.
Ventus Prime 4
Where the scores come from
Independent tests
- Tested by
- Tyre Reviews
TyreReviews 8-test aggregate vs HS52: wet braking ~equal; wet profile 92%.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Ecsta HS52
Where the scores come from
Independent tests
- Tested by
- Tyre Reviews
TyreReviews 8 tests vs Ventus Prime 4: HS52 won 5-3, ~0.4% quieter.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Questions
Which is better, the Ventus Prime 4 or the Ecsta HS52?
The Ventus Prime 4 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. No trait separates them by more than a point, so buy on price and availability in your size. The Ecsta HS52 usually costs less.
Where do these ratings come from?
From independent tyre tests where they exist (ADAC, Auto Bild, Tyre Reviews, evo, Tire Rack and others), rated 1 to 10 against other tyres in the same category, last reviewed October 2026. Neither tyre maker nor any retailer can change them.