Skip to content
ratio

Tyre comparison

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51

The Ventus Prime 4 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Ventus Prime 4 for dry grip and wet grip.

Hankook

Ventus Prime 4

Great wet grip for a mid-price tyre.

Grand touring · Mid-range

Yokohama

BluEarth-GT AE51

Balanced, quiet, good in the wet for the money.

Grand touring · Mid-range

Fit score by driver

The same 0–100 score the calculator ranks tyres by, weighted for each kind of driver. How we score

DriverVentus Prime 4BluEarth-GT AE51
Daily driving, wet winters60 (higher)42
Spirited roads, warm climate60 (higher)42
Longest life and lowest cost58 (higher)45

Trait by trait

Out of 10, against other grand touring tyres.

Ventus Prime 4BluEarth-GT AE51
Dry grip64
Wet grip73
Tread life55
Quiet & comfort56
Efficiency66

Ventus Prime 4

Where the scores come from

Independent tests

Tested by
Tyre Reviews

TyreReviews 8-test aggregate vs HS52: wet braking ~equal; wet profile 92%.

Data last reviewed: October 2026

BluEarth-GT AE51

Where the scores come from

Independent tests

Tested by
Tyre Reviews

TyreReviews aggregate: wet braking 7.2% longer than premium; wet 84% vs Hankook 92%.

Data last reviewed: October 2026

Questions

Which is better, the Ventus Prime 4 or the BluEarth-GT AE51?

The Ventus Prime 4 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Ventus Prime 4 for dry grip and wet grip.

Where do these ratings come from?

From independent tyre tests where they exist (ADAC, Auto Bild, Tyre Reviews, evo, Tire Rack and others), rated 1 to 10 against other tyres in the same category, last reviewed October 2026. Neither tyre maker nor any retailer can change them.