Tyre comparison
Falken Azenis RT660 vs Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
The Azenis RT660 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Azenis RT660 for wet grip and tread life. The Azenis RT660 usually costs less.
Falken
Azenis RT660
Durable 200TW favourite for track-day regulars.
Extreme performance (200TW) · Mid-range
Michelin
Pilot Sport Cup 2
Track-biased road tyre; OE on GT3-class cars.
Extreme performance (200TW) · Premium
Fit score by driver
The same 0–100 score the calculator ranks tyres by, weighted for each kind of driver. How we score
| Driver | Azenis RT660 | Pilot Sport Cup 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Mostly track | 82 (higher) | 75 |
| Road + track days | 73 (higher) | 61 |
| Spirited roads | 73 (higher) | 63 |
Trait by trait
Out of 10, against other extreme 200TW tyres.
Azenis RT660
Where the scores come from
Independent tests
- Tested by
- Tire Rack
- Year
- 2024
Tire Rack 2024: dry lap 1:39.85 (2nd); howling noise on smooth surfaces.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Pilot Sport Cup 2
Where the scores come from
Estimated: no independent test of this tyre found
Cup 2 R tests only (dry-braking best); wet weak; maker positioning.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Questions
Which is better, the Azenis RT660 or the Pilot Sport Cup 2?
The Azenis RT660 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Azenis RT660 for wet grip and tread life. The Azenis RT660 usually costs less.
Where do these ratings come from?
From independent tyre tests where they exist (ADAC, Auto Bild, Tyre Reviews, evo, Tire Rack and others), rated 1 to 10 against other tyres in the same category, last reviewed October 2026. Neither tyre maker nor any retailer can change them.