Tyre comparison
Falken Azenis RT660 vs Kumho Ecsta V730
The Azenis RT660 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Azenis RT660 for dry grip and tread life. The Ecsta V730 usually costs less.
Falken
Azenis RT660
Durable 200TW favourite for track-day regulars.
Extreme performance (200TW) · Mid-range
Fit score by driver
The same 0–100 score the calculator ranks tyres by, weighted for each kind of driver. How we score
| Driver | Azenis RT660 | Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| Mostly track | 82 (higher) | 67 |
| Road + track days | 73 (higher) | 62 |
| Spirited roads | 73 (higher) | 62 |
Trait by trait
Out of 10, against other extreme 200TW tyres.
Azenis RT660
Where the scores come from
Independent tests
- Tested by
- Tire Rack
- Year
- 2024
Tire Rack 2024: dry lap 1:39.85 (2nd); howling noise on smooth surfaces.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Ecsta V730
Where the scores come from
Independent tests
- Tested by
- Tire Rack
- Year
- 2024
Tire Rack 2024: 'a little less grip than the others'.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Questions
Which is better, the Azenis RT660 or the Ecsta V730?
The Azenis RT660 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Azenis RT660 for dry grip and tread life. The Ecsta V730 usually costs less.
Where do these ratings come from?
From independent tyre tests where they exist (ADAC, Auto Bild, Tyre Reviews, evo, Tire Rack and others), rated 1 to 10 against other tyres in the same category, last reviewed October 2026. Neither tyre maker nor any retailer can change them.