Tyre comparison
Falken Azenis RT660 vs Nankang Sportnex CR-S
The Azenis RT660 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Azenis RT660 for dry grip and tread life. The Sportnex CR-S usually costs less.
Falken
Azenis RT660
Durable 200TW favourite for track-day regulars.
Extreme performance (200TW) · Mid-range
Nankang
Sportnex CR-S
Budget 200TW that punches well above its price.
Extreme performance (200TW) · Value
Fit score by driver
The same 0–100 score the calculator ranks tyres by, weighted for each kind of driver. How we score
| Driver | Azenis RT660 | Sportnex CR-S |
|---|---|---|
| Mostly track | 82 (higher) | 57 |
| Road + track days | 73 (higher) | 53 |
| Spirited roads | 73 (higher) | 53 |
Trait by trait
Out of 10, against other extreme 200TW tyres.
Azenis RT660
Where the scores come from
Independent tests
- Tested by
- Tire Rack
- Year
- 2024
Tire Rack 2024: dry lap 1:39.85 (2nd); howling noise on smooth surfaces.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Sportnex CR-S
Where the scores come from
Independent tests
- Tested by
- Tire Rack
- Year
- 2024
Tire Rack 2024 Extreme test 5 (included); detail not read; budget placing.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Questions
Which is better, the Azenis RT660 or the Sportnex CR-S?
The Azenis RT660 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Azenis RT660 for dry grip and tread life. The Sportnex CR-S usually costs less.
Where do these ratings come from?
From independent tyre tests where they exist (ADAC, Auto Bild, Tyre Reviews, evo, Tire Rack and others), rated 1 to 10 against other tyres in the same category, last reviewed October 2026. Neither tyre maker nor any retailer can change them.