Tyre comparison
Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE51
The Ecsta HS52 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Ecsta HS52 for wet grip. The Ecsta HS52 usually costs less.
Fit score by driver
The same 0–100 score the calculator ranks tyres by, weighted for each kind of driver. How we score
| Driver | Ecsta HS52 | BluEarth-GT AE51 |
|---|---|---|
| Daily driving, wet winters | 55 (higher) | 42 |
| Spirited roads, warm climate | 53 (higher) | 42 |
| Longest life and lowest cost | 53 (higher) | 45 |
Trait by trait
Out of 10, against other grand touring tyres.
Ecsta HS52
Where the scores come from
Independent tests
- Tested by
- Tyre Reviews
TyreReviews 8 tests vs Ventus Prime 4: HS52 won 5-3, ~0.4% quieter.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
BluEarth-GT AE51
Where the scores come from
Independent tests
- Tested by
- Tyre Reviews
TyreReviews aggregate: wet braking 7.2% longer than premium; wet 84% vs Hankook 92%.
Data last reviewed: October 2026
Questions
Which is better, the Ecsta HS52 or the BluEarth-GT AE51?
The Ecsta HS52 scores higher for every kind of driver we tested. Choose the Ecsta HS52 for wet grip. The Ecsta HS52 usually costs less.
Where do these ratings come from?
From independent tyre tests where they exist (ADAC, Auto Bild, Tyre Reviews, evo, Tire Rack and others), rated 1 to 10 against other tyres in the same category, last reviewed October 2026. Neither tyre maker nor any retailer can change them.